A Different Take on What Really Motivates Your Team
Ivy Exec's recent article argues—quite correctly, at first—that growth opportunities, recognition, culture, and meaningful work form the core of employee motivation (Career Center OU Online). As a CBT‑trained therapist and workplace culture expert, I wholeheartedly agree that these are essential. However, I believe their analysis overlooks three critical dimensions: the underexplored interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, the emotional labor of genuine burnout, and how systemic workplace structures can undermine any engagement strategy. Here’s why we need a deeper, more nuanced outlook:
1. Intrinsic Motivators Aren’t Enough (and They Aren’t Truly ‘Intrinsic’)
The article praises “meaningful work” and autonomy—hallmarks of Daniel Pink’s concept of Drive, which emphasizes autonomy, mastery, and purpose (Wikipedia). Pink’s model is powerful, but it doesn’t mean we should dismiss extrinsic incentives as Ivy Exec implies. The danger lies in assuming that internal motivation alone will sustain performance.
Research shows that intrinsic drives thrive when basic needs, such as fair pay, psychological safety, and manageable workloads, are met. Remove those, and the purpose loses its pull. Overemphasize “passion” without adequate compensation, and employees feel exploited, not engaged. So yes, design meaningful work, but pair it with fair systems, transparent policies, and real support.
2. Engagement Lies Beyond Recognition and Culture
Ivy Exec positions recognition, growth programs, and clean workspaces as solutions. While these are helpful, they often serve as band-aids when deeper systemic issues persist:
Structural injustice—who gets promoted, whose ideas are heard—matters. Recognition is a nice-to-have, but real equity comes from dismantling bias and building inclusive systems.
Leadership emotional intelligence is essential. Teams mirror the tone set by leaders. A culture of psychological safety comes from consistent empathy, not one-off appreciation posts.
Workload balance is missing. We can build growth initiatives, but if people are chronically overworked or fear being seen as slackers for taking time off, programs don’t stick.
In a recent TED segment, a social scientist noted, “Employee engagement programs fail when they treat engagement as a superficial activity, not a system” (cdo.business.rice.edu). Authentic culture lives in the day-to-day.
3. Burnout Isn’t a Side Effect—it’s Often the Product of Engagement Efforts
Ivy Exec rightly acknowledges the importance of stress and autonomy (Career Center OU Online). However, here’s the catch: many engagement strategies, such as spot awards, peer recognition, and task forces, add to employees’ cognitive load, ironically increasing burnout.
What’s missing is compassionate load management. Leaders need to ask: Who is already overextended? Who sees “optional engagement” as another checkbox? A study by Gallup estimates that disengaged—or worse, cynically engaged employees cost organizations $8.8 trillion globally (Wikipedia). That’s not because recognition is missing, it’s because when people are stretched thin, meaning doesn’t rescue them.
4. Purpose Without Agency Doesn’t Stick
Ivy Exec calls meaningful work a powerful antidote to stress: “Meaningful work makes all the stress worth it” (Career Center OU Online). But meaning that isn’t tied to real agency and decision-making authority can feel hollow. If the purpose is window dressing for monotonous tasks, employees become resentful.
A trustworthy agency means empowering teams to shape what work looks like, encompassing both left-brain and right-brain thinking, process redesign, and iteration. It’s not about autonomy as long as you meet quota—it’s about trust in your people to better their roles and tools.
5. Growth & Recognition as Systems, Not Events
Programs without follow-through fall flat. Ivy Exec lists professional development and internal mobility as keys. These are critical—but only if:
Internal mobility is wealth-building, not lateral shuffling.
Development isn’t just a lunch‑and‑learn, but includes stretch assignments, cross‑training, and structured mentorship.
Recognition isn’t performative, but genuine, private, and tied to organizational impact.
Too often, companies mislabel superficial activities as “engagement” while real systems lag.
6. The Hidden Cost of 'Culture' Without Structural Equity
They say clean workspace, open feedback, diversity, and well-being—fine—but these are components, not the architecture. If people don’t trust that feedback leads to action, that diversity is meaningful (not token), or that well-being includes fair leave and healthy expectations, then “culture” becomes branding.
Structural equity means transparent promotion criteria, inclusion in decision-making, and fiscal wellness (Ivy Exec suggests debt-relief programs, which is smart, but spotty without broader financial wellness). It means normalizing breaks, parental leave across levels, and redistributing power where it belongs.
A Better Framework: The Three Scalpel Cuts
To turn engagement into lasting performance and well-being, do these:
Equitable Design
Align pay bands, growth roles, and feedback loops.
Create transparent career paths that account for hidden labor (e.g., mentorship or wellness leadership).
Compassionate Workload Architecture
Institute “no meeting” days.
Audit discretionary engagement efforts for overload.
Train managers to spot overwhelmed employees (CBT-style check-ins work wonders here).
Agency‑Driven Purpose
Let teams own both the what and the how.
Use customer and peer feedback to fuel iterative ownership.
Highlight impact, but empower impact-shaping.
Conclusion
Ivy Exec is right: growth, recognition, culture, and meaning are vital. But they aren't silver bullets; they're features of a system, not the system itself. Real engagement requires structural design, not just employee‑facing campaigns.
As leaders, our role is to mind the architecture—holding systems accountable and resilient, not just planning the next engagement event. When your structures support fairness, well‑being, sustainable workloads, and genuine agency, your people don't just feel motivated—they are. And that’s ultimately why burnout declines, retention rises, and ROI improves—not because we check the culture box, but because we care deeply about how our work gets done and who it gets done with.
That’s not just an engagement “tip”—it’s a leadership practice.
—
Michael D. Levitt is a CBT & NLP‑trained therapist, keynote speaker, and author of Workplace Culture and Burnout Proof. He coaches organizations on building work cultures that scale compassion and human performance.
